Pricing

This page holds two separate scales, one section each. One covers structuring and closing a deal, paid by the party commissioning the work. The other covers portfolios delivered to developers and agencies, paid by the seller. They carry different payers and different promises; nothing below blends the two into a single figure.

Set aside 2–4% of the project budget for structuring and closing a deal. The larger the project, the lower that share: the work involved grows more slowly than the project's scale. The percentage is set against the project budget — land plus hard costs plus soft costs — never against the sale price, the value of the land alone, or the amount of capital raised. All figures on this scale are stated before tax.

Every party inside the deal construction covers this calculation in proportion to its own share. That is what keeps the calculation from working in favor of any one side alone.

That percentage covers two things priced two different ways. The core of the work — land and market analysis, the financial model, the deal construction itself — sits on a fixed cost, because its scope barely moves with project size: a two-hectare parcel isn't ten times easier to work through than a twenty-hectare one. What does move with project size is everything past the core — bringing the parties together, negotiating, carrying the construction to signature — so that part is what the percentage prices.

Before any of that, there is a first step: a diagnostic — a fast read of the parcel or the asset, its zoning, its constraints, a rough program for what it can hold. It is billed as individual paid work from the first conversation, priced according to the parcel's own complexity and the people involved, not off a fixed menu.

Beyond structuring and closing, NOZH can also stay in a deal for the long run and share in what it produces. That later stage carries its own name — a share in the outcome — but neither its percentage nor its cap is published here: those terms are set individually, case by case, for the same honest reason the first diagnostic can't be priced off a list.

NOZH also builds ready investment portfolios sized to a developer's own unsold inventory — for the developer directly, or for an agency selling that inventory on the developer's behalf. The developer pays. The base here is different from the scale above: everything on this ladder is set against the value of the deal itself, not the project budget.

That ladder runs in three steps, all set against deal value and all paid by the developer: 0.25% for handing an agency a ready portfolio, where the agency brings its own client and closes the deal; 0.5% for a portfolio paired with a qualified lead, closed by the developer; and 1% for a portfolio, a lead, and NOZH staying with the deal through the agency to closing.

On this ladder, the developer or the agency is the paying client, and any investor in the deal works with a licensed agent under that agent's own responsibility, not with NOZH directly.

Past product supply at 0.25%, the far end of that same ladder is a different occupation, not a higher price on the same one. Running as the agency itself, start to finish, is agency work: it requires a license by jurisdiction, and NOZH does not offer it today.

Every figure on this page is a percentage. There is no absolute amount in any currency here, so a dollar reference wouldn't attach to anything either.